Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bethany S.B.'s avatar

Do they not see how racist this is against the people they purport to protect? Asserting that the fight against antisemitism constitutes anti-Palestinian racism means that they believe antisemitism is inherent to being Palestinian. By concluding that to condemn terrorism is to engage in anti-Palestinian racism, it is *they* who are equating terrorism with Palestinian identity. I believe the term for this is "the soft bigotry of low expectations." Why do these so-called defenders of Palestinians think so little of those they claim to defend? It's a rhetorical question of course -- they've boxed themselves into a corner. How else, if not through more racism, could they justify Oct 7 and the world's grotesque response?

Expand full comment
Jill P.'s avatar

I wonder how this definition of anti Palestinian racism would stand up to a legal challenge. But in the meantime I am so disgusted by the suspension of facts and history, and what it has led to (ie APR)

Expand full comment

No posts